Author response to editorial comment URL-D-24-02203 We appreciate and thank for this editorial comment to our contribution. Because of its location deep in the pelvis, closely related to continence and erection mechanisms, reconstruction of posterior urethral stenosis (PUS) is probably one of the most challenging scenarios in reconstructive urology. Although the traditional reconstructive technique (transecting excision and primary anastomosis - EPA) has shown a high success rate for most etiologies of PUS, failures still occur. The main reasons for failure include incomplete removal of the fibrous urethral disease and inadequate diameter and/or tension at the anastomosis.
https://www.goldjournal.net/ar....ticle/S0090-4295(24)